Jump to content


Photo

Holder Sizing Debate – Stick with 288 or Go Up to 296?


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 iceman8310

iceman8310
  • LocationMassachusetts

Posted 10 March 2025 - 11:52 AM

Hey everyone, looking for some input on holder sizing. I’m debating whether to stick with the stock 288 size or go up to 296.

I know the standard 288 should be the most natural fit for a 10D skate, but I’ve had a few people suggest going up a size for added stability, glide, and a longer stride. On the other hand, I don’t want to lose too much agility, since I rely on quick movements and edge control.

I’m also considering switching from Tuuk Edge to CCM XS holders, as I’ve heard they’re stiffer and provide a more responsive feel. Has anyone made the jump to a larger holder size, and if so, did you notice any significant benefits or drawbacks? Also, any thoughts on Tuuk Edge vs. CCM XS for overall performance?

Would love to hear any experiences or recommendations before I commit! Thanks.

Hey everyone, looking for some input on holder sizing. I’m debating whether to stick with the stock 288 size or go up to 296.

I know the standard 288 should be the most natural fit for a 10D skate, but I’ve had a few people suggest going up a size for added stability, glide, and a longer stride. On the other hand, I don’t want to lose too much agility, since I rely on quick movements and edge control.

I’m also considering switching from Tuuk Edge to CCM XS holders, as I’ve heard they’re stiffer and provide a more responsive feel. Has anyone made the jump to a larger holder size, and if so, did you notice any significant benefits or drawbacks? Also, any thoughts on Tuuk Edge vs. CCM XS for overall performance?

Would love to hear any experiences or recommendations before I commit! Thanks.



#2 Golden Gate Sharpening

Golden Gate Sharpening
  • LocationNorthern California

Posted 10 March 2025 - 02:59 PM

I'd recommend trying a flatter profile before switching holders.

 

Doc3-copy.jpg

 

ProSharpProfiles_2.jpg


"What is your lowest/best price?" is NOT an offer. 


#3 iceman8310

iceman8310
  • LocationMassachusetts

Posted 10 March 2025 - 06:33 PM

I hate pro sharp. Not looking for a flatter blade. I like being in my toes

I'd recommend trying a flatter profile before switching holders.



Doc3-copy.jpg

ProSharpProfiles_2.jpg



#4 Golden Gate Sharpening

Golden Gate Sharpening
  • LocationNorthern California

Posted 10 March 2025 - 08:17 PM

You can still profile your steel with a have a forward pitch. 

 

Otherwise, SB 4.0's are stiffer than Edge holders. Powefly holders are stiffer as well. Whether you like a stiffer holder or more flexible holder is preference and up to you. 


"What is your lowest/best price?" is NOT an offer. 


#5 iceman8310

iceman8310
  • LocationMassachusetts

Posted 11 March 2025 - 12:22 PM

You can still profile your steel with a have a forward pitch. 

 

Otherwise, SB 4.0's are stiffer than Edge holders. Powefly holders are stiffer as well. Whether you like a stiffer holder or more flexible holder is preference and up to you. 

i'm going to stick with the 288 and go xs holder.  need to sell my extra steel



#6 Buzz_LightBeer

Buzz_LightBeer

Posted 11 March 2025 - 04:37 PM

I’m going to second his opinion. Anything you want to accomplish could be done with profiling rather than larger holders. Even if you have to experiment a bit

Good Idea; Whistling while you work.

Bad Idea; Whistling while you eat.


#7 iceman8310

iceman8310
  • LocationMassachusetts

Posted 12 March 2025 - 08:44 AM

I’m going to second his opinion. Anything you want to accomplish could be done with profiling rather than larger holders. Even if you have to experiment a bit


I want to keep the leaning forward profile but want to see if the longer holder would be beneficial